{"id":5793,"date":"2016-01-18T09:12:34","date_gmt":"2016-01-18T08:12:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/e3magpmp.greatsolution.dev\/?page_id=5793"},"modified":"2022-02-06T00:29:50","modified_gmt":"2022-02-05T23:29:50","slug":"book-tips-paradoxes","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/e3magpmp.greatsolution.dev\/en\/buchtipps\/book-tips-paradoxes\/","title":{"rendered":"Book tips - Paradoxes"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Paradoxes<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

We encounter contradictions almost every day: in everyday life, at work, in the media. Thinking traps are sometimes difficult to recognize. Inevitably, we fall for them and sometimes make the wrong decisions. Paradoxes are phenomena whose apparent contradictions fascinate us and inspire us to deal intensively with the solution of the riddles. Often this requires logical and mathematical skills. We also encounter paradoxes in philosophy, in metaphysics, when we deal with the inexplicable, such as the beginning of time or the infinity of the universe. In computer science, for example, anomalies in databases pose puzzles. This time we present a collection of such paradoxes: Books show which thinking traps you can fall into and how aha experiences occur when you recognize the previously unknown context of meaning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\" The same leaves us alone, but it is the contradiction that makes us productive. \" -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe<\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Source: E-3 Magazine - Issue December\/January 2016<\/span><\/p>

\"\"<\/a><\/div>
\"\"<\/a><\/div>
\"\"<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"Paradoxes\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

Paradoxes<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Which came first, hen or egg? Such seemingly irresolvable contradictions, so-called paradoxes, are an integral part of science and philosophy, as well as of our everyday life. Strictly speaking, they are even a central prerequisite for many forms of progress in knowledge in the history of mankind. Paradoxes force us to question the premises of our reasoning and, if necessary, subject them to rigorous scrutiny. Yet most people fear these seemingly inconclusive lines of thought.<\/p>\n\n\n\n