Author: Matthias Kneissl, Q-Partners
Managing Director at Q-Partners Consulting und Management GmbH
September 7, 2017
Maintenance for SAP Solution Manager 7.1 will end at the end of 2017. IT users should now use the remaining time to make the switch promptly.
March 31, 2017
SolMan 7.2 provides a fully comprehensive tool for management and, above all, for the transition in the direction of S/4. However, the advantages of the tool only become apparent in combination.
February 1, 2017
As part of the SolMan upgrade strategy, solution documentation is one of the biggest issues. Although the effort of a conversion is considerable, it is a good investment in the future.
November 3, 2016
As part of the maintenance strategy, I am repeatedly asked how companies should design and plan the changeover to Solution Manager 7.2.
November 1, 2016
With the new version 7.2, SAP has given Solution Manager an easier-to-use and intuitive user interface for the first time.
October 1, 2016
The switch to Hana is becoming increasingly important. IT managers should think carefully about where to start with their project.
September 1, 2016
The cluster option of Change Request Management offers many advantages - IT managers should nevertheless know what they are getting into.
June 2, 2016
In the past, many IT managers were concerned with managing their changes. The next stage is the topic of cost and activity allocation.
May 4, 2016
With version 7.2, ChaRM release management has been comprehensively expanded and renovated. But with new techniques, the challenges also lie in the organization.
April 3, 2016
Version 7.2 of Solution Manager offers a number of new functions for operating Hana environments efficiently. In addition to the technical changes, however, organizational adjustments are also necessary.
April 3, 2016
With Hana and S/4, a new programming model is coming to the Abap world. SAP users who are considering the cloud should revise customer-specific developments in good time.
March 31, 2016
There are still many IT departments that manage their SAP transports manually. A ChaRM implementation makes more than sense here, but should also be planned and coordinated.